|
Shortleaf research, newspaper articles, fact sheets, conference proceedings, literature reviews, and brochures.
Management
Impact of tip moth injury on growth and yield of 16-year-old loblolly and shortleaf pine
Williston, H. L., & Barras, S. J. (1976). Impact of tip moth injury on growth and yield of 16-year-old loblolly and shortleaf pine. Southern Forest Experiment Station, Research Note SO-221. Retrieved from https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/rn/rn_so221.pdf 
Impacts of shortleaf pine-hardwood forest management on soils in the Ouachita Highlands: a review
Liechty, H. O., Shelton, M. G., Luckow, K. R., & Turton, D. J. (2002). Impacts of shortleaf pine-hardwood forest management on soils in the Ouachita Highlands: a review. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 26(1), 43-51. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/sjaf/2002/00000026/00000001/art00008
Management of southern pine forests for cattle production
Byrd, N. A., Lewis, C. E., & Pearson, H. A. (1984). Management of southern pine forests for cattle production. Forest Service Southern Region, General report R8-GR 4. Retrieved from http://nac.unl.edu/documents/silvopasture/R8GR4.pdf
Managing Piedmont Forests to Reduce Losses from the Littleleaf Disease- Southern Pine Beetle Complex
Belanger, R. P., Hedden, R. L., & Tainter, F. H. (1986). Managing Piedmont Forests to Reduce Losses from the Littleleaf Disease- Southern Pine Beetle Complex. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Cooperative State Research Service, Agriculture Handbook 649. Retrieved from https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=CAT86866749&content=PDF
Managing shortleaf pine in littleleaf disease areas
Campbell, W. A. (1953). Managing shortleaf pine in littleleaf disease areas. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Station Paper NO-25. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/managingshortlea25camp
Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.)
Stewart, J. F., Liu, Y., Tauer, C. G., & Nelson, C. D. (2010). Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.). Tree Genetics & Genomes, 6(6), 853-862. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11295-010-0296-8
Productivity comparison of 37-year-old loblolly-shortleaf pine seed sources in southern Illinois
Rink, G., & Wells, O. O. (1988). Productivity comparison of 37-year-old loblolly-shortleaf pine seed sources in southern Illinois. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 5(2), 155-158. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/njaf/1988/00000005/00000002/art00026
Restoration and management of shortleaf pine in pure and mixed stands-science, empirical observation, and the wishful application of generalities
Guldin, J. M. (2007). Restoration and management of shortleaf pine in pure and mixed stands-science, empirical observation, and the wishful application of generalities. Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium; 2006 November 7-9; Springfield, MO. Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-P-15. Retrieved from https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_p-15%20papers/7guldin-p-15.pdf
Shortleaf pine primer
Mattoon, W. R. (1980). Shortleaf pine primer. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farmers' Bulletin No. 1534. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/CAT87203889/farmbul1534#page/n1/mode/2up
Shortleaf pine: its economic importance and forest management
Mattoon, W. R. (1915b). Shortleaf pine: its economic importance and forest management. Bulletin of the US Dept. of Agriculture No. 308. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/108229#/summary |
