|
Shortleaf research, newspaper articles, fact sheets, conference proceedings, literature reviews, and brochures.
All Shortleaf publications and documents
Productivity of planted shortleaf pine in artificially compacted Clarksville soil
Ponder Jr, F. (2007). Productivity of planted shortleaf pine in artificially compacted Clarksville soil. Proceedings of a symposium; 2006 November 7-9; Springfield, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-15. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 158-164. Retrieved from https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_p-15%20papers/28ponder-p-15.pdf
Progress in the chemistry of shortleaf and loblolly pine bark flavonoids
Hemingway, R., & McGraw, G. (1976). Progress in the chemistry of shortleaf and loblolly pine bark flavonoids. Applied Polymer Symposium No. 28: 1349-1364. Retrieved from https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_hemingway027.pdf 
Protection of shortleaf pine from insects and disease
Tainter, F. (1986). Protection of shortleaf pine from insects and disease. Proceedings of symposium on the shortleaf pine ecosystem; 1986 March 31-April 2; Little Rock, AR. Monticello, AR: Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service: 235-247. Retrieved from http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/45859
Radiographic Analysis of Shortleaf Pine Seeds From the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests
Mangini, A. C., Bruce, W. W., & Hanula, J. L. (2004). Radiographic Analysis of Shortleaf Pine Seeds From the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests. Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-74. Retrieved from http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/6504
Recovery from topkill of shortleaf pine × loblolly pine hybrids compared to their parent populations
Will, R. E., Lilly, C. J., Stewart, J., Huff, S., & Tauer, C. G. (2013). Recovery from topkill of shortleaf pine × loblolly pine hybrids compared to their parent populations. Trees, 27(4), 1167-1174. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00468-013-0866-0.pdf
Regenerating shortleaf pine in clearcuts in the Missouri Ozark Highlands
Gwaze, D., & Johanson, M. (2013). Regenerating shortleaf pine in clearcuts in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-GTR-175. Retrieved from https://www.srs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_srs175/gtr_srs175_247.pdf
Regenerating shortleaf pine: results of a 5-year cooperative research initiative
Barnett, J. P., & Brissette, J. C. (2007). Regenerating shortleaf pine: results of a 5-year cooperative research initiative. Northern Research Station, General Technical Reports 105-111. Retrieved from https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_p-15%20papers/17barnett-p-15.pdf
Regenerating uneven-aged stands of loblolly and shortleaf pines: the current state of knowledge
Shelton, M. G., & Cain, M. D. (2000). Regenerating uneven-aged stands of loblolly and shortleaf pines: the current state of knowledge. Forest Ecology and Management, 129(1), 177-193. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112799001619
Regeneration development across a range of reproduction cutting methods in shortleaf pine and pine-hardwood stands in the Interior Highlands
Guldin, J. M., Baker, J. B., & Shelton, M. G. (2004). Regeneration development across a range of reproduction cutting methods in shortleaf pine and pine-hardwood stands in the Interior Highlands. Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-74. Retrieved from http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/viewpub.php?index=6480
Regeneration methods affect genetic variation and structure in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.)
Raja, R. G., Tauer, C. G., Wittwer, R. F., & Huang, Y. (1998). Regeneration methods affect genetic variation and structure in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.). Forest Genetics, 5(3), 171-178. Retrieved from https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_raja001.pdf |
